Posts Tagged ‘Autism’
Using the Microsoft Kinect to Detect Autism
Kids Playing Flickr user Michale

There are five Microsoft Kinects set up all around the University of Minnesota's Institute of Child Development, but they're not for playing games (or any of the other stuff the Kinect can do with an Xbox). They're monitoring the students, looking for signs of unusual behavior that might indicate a potential autism spectrum disorder.

Autism spectrum disorder, or ASD--a range of conditions that all fall under the broad term of "autism"--can be difficult to diagnose. Many behaviors, especially in small children, are subtle, little tweaks of behavior that are just enough different from the norm to warrant a closer look. Following the clues is a time-consuming and slow process--it takes hours upon hours of observation, and not everyone can afford a trained specialist (or MRI test) to do that for their child. That can mean undiagnosed and thus untreated children.

The Kinects are set up in the Institute of Child Development to track the individual children by size and the color of their clothing, and can monitor about ten children at a time. Software takes the raw visual data from the Kinects and runs it through an algorithm to look for possible markers of ASD, like an unusually hyperactive or unusually quiet and calm child. It's not designed to replace specialists--it can't really track some telltale signs of ASD, like a failure to make eye contact--but it could be an incredibly cost-effective early heads-up system, making sure that everyone can afford early diagnostics.

[New Scientist]

 
Scientists Switch Social Behaviors On and Off in Mice, Shedding Light on Human Social Disorders

Just yesterday we learned that Caltech researchers can use pulses of light to toggle aggressive behaviors in the mouse brain. Today we learn that elsewhere on the West Coast scientists are turning social behaviors in mice on and off using the same method, and that could have big implications for social disorders like autism and schizophrenia in humans.

Using optogenetics--essentially, bioengineering different clusters of nerve cells to respond to certain frequencies of light--a team of Stanford researchers has found a way to test an established yet untested hypothesis about social dysfunction. This hypothesis holds that social-behavior deficits are linked to the propensity of excitatory nerve cells versus inhibitory nerve cells to fire.

That is, when facing social stimulus people with social disorders experience an imbalance wherein too many excitatory nerves fire (or not enough inhibitory nerves fire) resulting in a kind of over-responsiveness. This lines up nicely with empirical evidence (for instance, autistic people becoming agitated by loud noises or by too many people talking at the same time) as well as a certain anomalous brain-wave pattern known as gamma-oscillation that is detected in many people suffering from autism or schizophrenia.

In their mice, the researchers used optogenetics to bioengineer excitatory and inhibitory nerve cells in the parts of the brain responsible for social function to fire on command. That is, using different frequencies of light they could bias excitability. They then introduced them into social environments and tested them against a control group.

The researchers found that when they amped up the excitability in their optogenitically modified mice, the test subjects became almost instantly antisocial--and they also exhibited that heretofore inexplicable gamma-oscillation pattern in their brain waves. When the researchers restored balance by turning up the inhibitory nerve cell firing, the mice regained a significant amount of social function almost immediately.

Of course, this is significant because it might just get at the root of antisocial behavior brought on by social disorders like autism and schizophrenia. From a nervous system standpoint, mice and humans aren't all that different (it's thought that we shared a common ancestor some 75 million years ago). So these findings could be quite relevant to research into treatment for those suffering from schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders.

 
Camera-Equipped Glasses Can Analyze the Expression of the Person You’re Talking To
It's All About the Expression What's he really trying to say? Gert Germeraad via Wikimedia

Sometimes, the look on someone's face says it all. More often, our facial expressions are nuanced. More often still, we misinterpret the bevy of information conveyed by the people's changing expressions. So a Cambridge researcher--with some help from an MIT colleague--set out to build a kind of decoder for facial cues. The result: a pair of glasses that deciphers what a person is feeling and transmit that meaning to the person wearing them.

The glasses themselves are just a prototype. A set of frames is embedded with a camera the size of a grain of rice, which connects to a small computer about the size of a standard deck of playing cards. Tracking 24 points on the face, the camera focuses on the person opposite, transmitting information about that person's facial tics to a software program that compares the data with a set of well-defined expressions.

The information can be detailed on a nearby computer monitor or, perhaps more conveniently, spoken into the wearer's ear via an earphone. The glasses also have a pretty straightforward visual cue: a green light flashing inside the frames means the person is interested, agreeing, or thoughtfully engaged. A red light spells boredom, disagreement disgust, etc.

The idea isn't just to help you decipher what your significant other is really saying. The Cambridge researcher who conceived the glasses was looking for a way to help autistic people--who have trouble interpreting the emotional states of others--to interact socially. Experimenting with the glasses, researchers at Cambridge have found that they indeed help autistic people with their socials skills, and that some ability to accurately read emotional facial expressions persists even after the glasses are removed.

Lost more on this via New Scientist.

[New Scientist]